Familienministerin – Gemeinsame Kinderbetreuung nach Trennung

Paritätische Betreuung (Doppelresidenz) von Scheidungskindern gegensteuern!


Bei einer 50:50-Lösung entfallen die herkömmlichen Unterhaltspflichten.

Select  another  Language !
           english  language  (Google Translation)
        ПЕРЕВЕСТИ на Английский
            France – français (traduction Google)
            Italia – lingua italiana (traduzione di Google)

Artikel:

 

Wechselmodell – Von der Rolle

SZ-Grafik; Quelle: Allensbacher Archiv, 2017

Bundesfamilienministerin Katarina Barley (SPD) will dafür sorgen, dass sich mehr Eltern nach einer Trennung gemeinsam um ihre Kinder kümmern können und unterstützt werden. Statt geschiedenen Müttern – wie bisher oft üblich – mehr oder weniger selbstverständlich den Löwenanteil der Betreuung zu überlassen und Vätern die Zahlung von Unterhalt, könnten in Zukunft auch Scheidungsväter mehr Zeit mit ihren Kindern verbringen. Und auch das umstrittene Wechselmodell, bei dem Kinder jeweils zur Hälfte bei Mutter und Vater leben, nimmt die Ministerin ins Visier. Bisher konnte es gegen den Willen eines Elternteils nicht angeordnet werden. Nach einem Urteil des Bundesgerichtshofs könnte sich das nun ändern. Eine Gesetzesänderung aber gibt es noch nicht. Im Dialog mit Experten, der am Dienstag in Berlin begonnen hat, will Barley nun klären, wie gemeinsames Erziehen nach einer Trennung erleichtert werden kann.

„Jede Familie gestaltet ihr Zusammenleben so, wie es für sie passt“, sagte Barley der Süddeutschen Zeitung. Holzschnittartige Regelungen, wie sie früher oft üblich gewesen seien, passten zu den vielfältigen Familienformen der Gegenwart nicht mehr. Auch wandle sich das Rollenbild bei Beruf und Kindererziehung. „Deshalb verbietet sich für den Fall einer Trennung der Eltern eine einheitliche gesetzliche Regelung, wie das Leben danach gestaltet wird.“ Viele Eltern wünschten sich nach der Trennung eine gemeinsame Kinderbetreuung. „Nicht allen gelingt das.“ Politik könne die Verletzungen einer Trennung zwar nicht verhindern, wohl aber „bessere Rahmenbedingungen für getrennte Eltern schaffen„.

Barleys Vorstoß zielt auf eine paritätischere Betreuung von Scheidungskindern, ist aber bewusst vorsichtig formuliert. Denn das Feld ist vermint. Väterorganisationen kämpfen seit Jahren offensiv um mehr Umgang mit Kindern, viele alleinerziehende Mütter halten dagegen. Sie befürchten, dass Väter sich noch stärker als bisher Unterhaltspflichten entziehen. Denn bei einer 50:50-Lösung entfallen die herkömmlichen Unterhaltspflichten.

Anders als ihre Vorgängerin signalisiert Familienministerin Barley mehr Offenheit für Anliegen der Väter. Dabei stützt sie sich auf Zahlen des Allensbach-Instituts, die der SZ vorliegen. Die zweistufige Untersuchung wurde 2016 begonnen und 2017 mit 605 Müttern und Vätern fortgesetzt. 51 Prozent der Befragten halten es demnach für eine „ideale Aufteilung“, wenn getrennte Mütter und Väter ihre Kinder jeweils etwa zur Hälfte betreuen. Tatsächlich aber übernahmen in knapp zwei Dritteln der Fälle die Mütter alle oder die meisten Betreuungspflichten. Nur 22 Prozent der Scheidungsmütter teilen sich Erziehungsaufgaben mit dem Ex-Partner weitgehend paritätisch. Und nur 15 Prozent der Eltern haben sich auf die glatte Halbe-halbe-Lösung eines Wechselmodells geeinigt. Für 52 Prozent der befragten Eltern komme eine solche Aufteilung nicht infrage.

29 Prozent glauben nicht an reibungslose Absprachen mit dem Ex-Partner

Die Zahlen sind mit Vorsicht zu genießen, denn die Auswahl befragter Eltern ist bei einem so kontroversen Thema ein Politikum. Unumstritten aber ist: Die Zahl der Eltern, die sich nach einer Trennung für gemeinsame Kinderbetreuung entscheiden oder sie wünschen, ist erheblich gestiegen. In früheren Jahren erzogen laut Untersuchung nur sieben Prozent Scheidungseltern Kinder weiter gemeinsam, heute sind es 22 Prozent – wobei offen bleibt, wer wie viel Zeit mit Kindern verbringt.

Erklärungsbedürftig ist aber auch, warum mehr als die Hälfte der Befragten angibt, eine Halbe-halbe-Aufteilung sei ideal, aber nur 15 Prozent so leben. Das Nein zum Wechselmodell begründen mit 38 Prozent die meisten damit, es sei nicht gut fürs Kind. Fast ebenso viele Befragte, 37 Prozent, halten die hälftige Aufteilung organisatorisch nicht für umsetzbar. 33 Prozent sehen beim Ex-Partner oder bei sich selbst berufliche Hürden für gemeinsame Betreuung. 34 Prozent der Befragten wollen grundsätzlich kein Wechselmodell. 29 Prozent verstehen sich mit dem Ex-Partner zu schlecht, um an reibungslose Absprachen zu glauben. Elf Prozent geben an, weniger Unterhalt zahlen zu wollen. 46 Prozent der befragten Scheidungsväter wünschen sich mehr Zeit mit ihren Kindern. Bei den Müttern sagen das nur sechs Prozent. 42 Prozent von ihnen wollen mehr Väterbeteiligung, bekommen sie aber nicht.

 

11. Juli 2017, 18:58 Uhr, Von Constanze von Bullion, Berlin
http://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/wechselmodell-von-der-rolle-1.3582748#2
Tags: Doppelresidenz – Scheidungskinder – paritätische Betreuung – Eltern – Väter – Wechselmodell – Familienministerin – Kinderbetreuung – Familienrecht – Kindeswohl – Menschenrechtsverletzung Art. 8 EMRK – Vaterlose Gesellschaft – Vaterschaft

It was the first islamic terrorist attack in austria . . .

It was the first islamic terrorist attack in austria

. . . by a bosnian muslim.  On 20 June 2015, the amok driver Alen R. drove in his off-road vehicle to the Grazer pedestrian zone.  The family is from Bihać.  Here are more than 90% Bosniaks.
In the trial, the EX woman from Alen R. said she was forced to wear a headscarf.  He is lying and is a very good actor, he is a Muslim and not a Roman Catholic.  As he claimed in the trial.

Islamist link to a jihadist
Process on 27-9-2016 statement of the woman:
Ms R. asks whether car dealers or competitors Alen R. had threatened that Alen R. together with Fikret B., a jihadist condemned at first instance, had beaten a Romanian.
—————————————–
->
The alleged Jihadist Fikret B. was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment at the regional court Graz.
The criminal court jury made the decision: the alleged Jihadist Fikret B. was sentenced to 8 years of imprisonment.  He radicalized in Austria.

The native Bosnian was found guilty of involvement in a terrorist organization and a criminal organization by the jury.
See also http://translate.google.de/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwp.me%2Fp4RGV9-1Vz&sandbox=1

Grazer Amok driver Alen R. took drugs

see also
Blood analysis: Grazer Amok driver Alen R. took drugs
http://www.krone.at/oesterreich/grazer-amokfahrer-alen-r-nahm-drogen-blutanalyse-zeigt-story-462721
Admin Family Family Law, on 28-06-2017

 read more – in english  language  (Google Translation)
http://translate.google.de/translate?hl=de&sl=de&tl=en&u=http://wp.me/p4RGV9-2kP

 

Parental Alienation Awareness Day 25 April 2017

International Parental Alienation Awareness Day 25 April 2017

Tomorrow is another awareness day but this one is marked from Australia to Zanzibar and back again.

The phrase parental alienation is the situation where one parent no longer sees their child on a regular basis, often due to influence of the parent who has custody. Some of that influence is brought to bear on the child themselves, and it can affect the whole family including grandparents.

Families Need Fathers Scotland is an organisation based in Edinburgh, and they are using the day to highlight the issue to politicians, judges, lawyers and other professionals who work with families.

Ian Maxwell, National Manager of FNF Scotland, says:

“As awareness grows of parental alienation and the damage that it does to all the parties concerned – even the alienating parent – we hope that ways of working with affected families to counteract and undo alienation can be developed and improved in Scotland. The family courts also need to develop an understanding of how best to handle such cases.

Families Need Fathers Scotland is marking Parental Alienation Awareness Day by launching a crowdfunding campaign to raise funds to support innovative work to counter alienation. We also are seeking to raise the topic in the Scottish Parliament on the Awareness Day.”

TAGS

EdinburghEdinburgh Local NewsEdinburgh NewsFamilies Need Fathers Scotland
Print Friendly

http://www.theedinburghreporter.co.uk/2017/04/international-parental-alienation-awareness-day-25-april-2017/

FAMILY LAW – Custody battle in Malaysia

Übersetzung in Deutsch

Here’s how easy it is to lose your child in a custody battle in Malaysia


Original image from financialgazette.co.zw

We all know how the saying goes – fall in love, then get married, then have a baby? For most people in love, a wedding is what they dream of. They seal their love for each other by exchanging vows and signing a marriage certificate, and live happily ever after. But… we all know that a Cinderella ending happens in fairy tales. In real life? Not so much. The happily-ever-after might fade and before we know it, it’s time to call a lawyer and say goodbye, even if there are things to consider… like children.

If there is a kid involved in a divorce, obviously only one parent will get custody of the child. The ideal situation is for both parents to seek mediation whereby they come to an amicable agreement without bringing it to court. Through this, the parents get to decide what is best for all parties and it’s also a lot more drama-free. But if both refuse to settle, this is where a custody battle comes in. It involves lawyers, money and the sole decider will be the judge.

Custody battles can get ugly, so Malaysians would want to think twice if they want to get a divorce if there are children involved. We’ve heard of many custody battles, but how does it actually work and what will cause you to lose the kid? We took a look at the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 (LRA) and here’s actually how easy it is to lose your child in a custody battle in Malaysia…

1. If you’re a dad and your kid is below 7 years

Malaysians have been seeing a pattern of custody being granted to more mothers than fathers. Image from mirror.co.uk

There’s a higher chance that the court will grant custody of children below the age of 7 to their MOTHERS, even though there’s an assumption that both parents are equally capable of caring for their child. According to Justice Faiza Tamby Chik, this is mainly due to the fact that babies are more physically dependent on their mommas by nature.

Malaysians have been seeing a pattern of custody being granted to more mothers than fathers and this has caused accusations of unfairness to dads. In order to gain custody, the father will have to prove that his spouse is not Mom of The Year and that he’s a better parent, in terms of finance and the overall welfare of the child, so the argument is completely refutable. The belief that younger kids are more attached to their mothers is actually no longer a legal requirement in many courts, but a case review study proved that an average 67% of judges in Malaysia still favour the presumption.

Meanwhile, the Syariah court states that the mother has a right of custody of a male child until he is 7 years old and a female child until she is 9 years old. Mothers may however apply to extend that right for the male child up to 9 years old and for the female child up to 11 years old. After that, the father has custody. If the child has reached an ‘age of discernment’, he/she can choose which parent to live with – the age of discernment is literally 8 years for the boy and 10 for the girl.

Although the judge is supposed to be all pro and stuff, many other professionals and parents continue to doubt the legitimacy of these decisions. Association Against Parental Alienation Kuala Lumpur and Selangor (Pemalik) has often claimed that decisions made in custody battles did not take into consideration the consequence of Parental Alienation Syndrome (PAS) in most cases.

“Parental alienation (PAS) occurs when one parent disallows the other parent from communicating with their children. The dominant parent then brainwashes the child against the other parent, assuring the child that it is all right to ignore the other parent.” – R.S. Ratna, Pemalik President, The Malaysian Bar

2. If your spouse converts your kid to Islam without your knowledge

indira_gandhi_3012_(2)

Indira Gandhi faced a custody nightmare when her ex-husband converted their kids to Islam and was granted custody by the Syariah Court. Image from The Malay Mail Online

Just so you know, Malaysia practices a DUAL justice system – civil law and Syariah lawSyariah law has a say over every Muslim in Malaysia and exclusively handles Islamic issues like family and religious matters. The two worlds never collided and everybody just kinda minded their own business, until people were accused of using the syariah law to their advantage and adding drama in custody battles.

The highly publicized cases of M. Indira Gandhi from Perak and S. Deepa from Negri Sembilan got people questioning how these laws function in relation to each other when both their ex-husbands unilaterally (means it’s done without the agreement or participation of other people it might affect) converted their kids to Islam and were granted custody by the Syariah Court. Both moms are Hindus and therefore, had no right to be there.

Obviously these moms weren’t gonna go down without a fight, so Indira challenged the case through the civil courts. She won and was granted full custody of her kids in 2010, but then her ex husband, Muhammad Riduan still refused to return their youngest daughter to her despite the High Court instructing the police to find him. However, the police got confused about who they should listen to…the civil court or Syariah court?

S. Deepa was involved in a similar custody battle. Image from http://hakam.org.my/

S. Deepa was involved in a similar custody battle. Image from hakam.org.my

And then the Court of Appeal (a very high level court) said the civil court shouldn’t interfere over Islamic issues, and that’s how Minister in the PM’s Department Datuk Seri Azalina Othman suggested an amendment to the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976. The new Bill will ensure that Indira and Deepa’s case will not happen again because conversion of a child under the age of 18 will now require consent of BOTH parents!

“Now we are saying that all marriages under civil law must be resolved by the civil courts, it doesn’t matter if one person converts to Islam, the marriage took place under civil law. This will in turn take into consideration the issue of custody of children, and those who were born out of the marriage under civil law, the civil courts should deal with these cases.” – Nazri Aziz, Tourism and Culture Minister, The Malay Mail Online

 

3. If your kid likes your spouse more

16521905_10154428590352153_572418244_n

But I like daddy, too. Original image from koolcampus.net

Also, the law that comes into play in deciding the custody of children revolves around the wishes of the child when he or she is of an age to express an independent opinion (that’s 8 years old). This is applicable in both the civil and Syariah courts. This may seem like the most obvious solution to custody battles…let the kid pick la…but many family law practitioners and child experts believe that children should NEVER be forced to make these decisions. Can you imagine the guilt that would stay with them because they were forced to choose between mummy or daddy?

Interviews with children are common in Malaysia although it may not be the most effective method to achieve results, especially if the interviews are conducted by the judge only. Child interviews are a lot more complex than they look, and most family judges are not TRAINED in that department.

“It is not a simple case of asking the child simple questions like: ‘Who do you like more?’ or ‘Who is a better parent?’ Judges must understand that children may be coached or trained by the parent holding custody, so the questions have to be couched differently and judges will have to learn to read between the lines to get to the truth. They need a lot of training for that.” – Lalitha Menon, Bar Council’s Family Law Committee chair, The Star

Consultant psychologist Valerie Jaques also believes that the kids cannot fully be relied on to make such a major decision as they have not reached the full potential to make good decisions. Asking the kids to choose puts them in a difficult position as it creates a lot of stress, confusion and fear of rejection in them.

“This aspect could be improved by allowing the judge power to conduct the interview with a child psychologist, and/or pediatrician.” – Fahri Azzat, lawyer

 

4. If the welfare officer doesn’t like you

a8d5e0e37bbcaae0f547fbec00431a25

Custody may not be granted to both parents if they are deemed unfit. Image from Pinterest

Ok la, the Law Reform (Marriage and Divorce) Act 1976 does not exactly give FULL control to children, as it does allow the court to listen to witnesses, doctor’s report, and the Welfare Officer. Some judges in Malaysia do depend on experts’ view to help with their decision.

While financial income is obviously very important (cause raising another human being ain’t cheap yo), the welfare of a child also includes providing him/her with support, love and security. Home and school environment is also looked into, so here’s a tip if you’re trying to win a custody battle: Tidy up your house and try to smile more at your kid and the Welfare Officer. As Welfare Officers mainly investigate the physical comforts, reports from psychiatrists and psychologists are highly helpful for their consideration.

However, Honey Tan, the Co-chairperson of the Bar Council Human Rights Committee and Chairperson of the Family Law Committee said the problem is that welfare reports are not very useful as Welfare Officers are not trained child specialists.

“It is a shame when parties cannot agree. In those situations, the judge is the best person to decide. Welfare reports should be obtained, but in practice, they are not of much use and not commonly ordered. Our Welfare Officers are not specialists in child rights and family dynamics, especially in situations where families are breaking down.” – Honey Tan, The Malaysian Bar

Aiyaya, some experts say better if the judge listens to Welfare Officer, others say better if the judge decides himself… then how? All in all, it looks like it puts either parent in a very precarious position. Either one could lose their children if it were up to Malaysian law. :-(

Think twice, thrice and as many times as you can before you get divorced if you have a kid

16443295_10154428623842153_1803441998_n

I know I’m very lovable but please stop fighting!! Image from think.kera.org

Overall, law experts and practitioners agree that Malaysian law is not perfect when it comes to custody battles.

Bar Council’s Lalitha Menon noted that it’s important for judges to undergo basic training. Another aspect to improve on is the lack of uniformity, as different judges have different practices. Vicky Alahakone, also a member of the Bar Council, said that many children become victims in the long run as a result of inconsistent practices.

To prevent all unnecessary stress on the kid, Pemalik has proposed for a panel to guide divorcing parents instead of them calling it quits there and then. The association proposed an Early Intervention Project where divorcing parents will have to discuss some serious stuff such as custody, finance, education and their kids’ upbringing before divorce do them part for good.

At the end of the day, it’s the children who might be most affected by a failed marriage, especially if it involves a daunting custody battle. You might think that they will get it over with after a while, but studies have shown that it’s something they carry with them for the rest of their lives. It will affect their studies, social relationships and psychological adjustment. After all, they are kids and their problems should only consist of not being able to eat ice cream for breakfast, not stuff like choose only one parent to live with.

„Kindesabnahme als Familienzerstörungswaffe“ – Internationalen Konferenz VICTIMS MISSION

VICTIMS MISSION organisiert internationale Konferenz am 28. Mai in Wien

Wien (pts020/19.05.2016/13:00) – Der gemeinnützige Verein VICTIMS MISSION lädt zur internationalen Konferenz „Kindesabnahme als Familienzerstörungswaffe“ ins Grand Hotel Wien am 28. Mai 2016 ein. Vorträge zum Thema halten Beate Kelly, Mag. Josef Maitz, Gerda Ressl, Cara St. Louis und Dr. Henning Witte. Anschließend gibt es eine Publikumsdiskussion.

1. Begrüßung, Einleitung und Moderation übernimmt Sissi Kammerlander.

Zitat: „Kindesabnahme ist psychologische Kriegsführung gegen die Zivilbevölkerung“

 

2. Beate Kelly (Hungary/Malta): Alien Children

International Conference „Child Abduction as a Weapon of Family Destruction“ (English):

VICTIMS MISSION Organises International Conference 28 May in Vienna, Austria

Beate Kelly is the grandmother of a cosmopolitan family. She was born with Hungarian nationality, grew up in Germany and has lost her grandchild by illegal actions of the child welfare office and family court. She received a medal of honour for 25 years of voluntary work for the Bavarian Red Cross (crisis intervention in rescue services). In 2010 she was a central actor in the exposure of mistreatment of the elderly in the AWO Markt Schwaben Bavarian care home. In August 2015/January 2016 the author and activist filed a report to the International Criminal Court in The Hague and the General Secretary of the United Nations regarding illegal abductions of children and other crimes. Her publication „Il Germanizi – Jugendamt Deutschland and the c(h)ase of children in Gozo“ tells the story of the child welfare office refugees in Malta and the methods German Jugendamt and family courts are using to get hold of children. (pdf version via http://www.alienchildren.com available from June 2016). Press releases are available on request.
https://www.change.org/p/un-security-…

Excerpts from a letter to the Secretary General Ban Ki-moon by Beate Kelly:

Dear General Secretary Mr Ban-ki Moon, Ladies and Gentlemen of the UN Security Council,
Unfortunately, I must continue with a very sad and horrifying subject regarding children and families (…) As you were informed by the organisation „Trennungsvaeter e.V“ in 2013 about the situation of abductions by an organisation in Germany called the Jugendamt, which acts without any supervising authority and takes children from their families, in many cases without even a court order (…) The case of „Chantal“, who was placed in a family of drug addicts and subsequently suffered a fatal methadone overdose, is only one of innumerable cases of children’s deaths (…) Mothers, fathers, grandparents and/or other relatives who have care and custody of a child are accused of suffering from mental illness and declared to be unable to bring up a child (…) I am not only addressing a flaw in the system. I am talking about violation against Children’s Rights, Human Rights and Disabled Rights, furthermore about crimes that, accordig to the UN Convention of Human Rights and the Rome Statute, seem to display the characteristics of war crimes.

Full Text: https://www.change.org/p/un-security-…

Source:
http://www.pressetext.com/news/201605…

 

Video bei 56m12sKommentar eines Vaters in Österreich:

Exfrau Super Nanny u. Ausbildnerin vom Jugendamt klebt Kinder den Mund zu . . .

 

3.Gerda Ressl (Österreich):

Gewalt und Macht gegenüber Schwächeren haben sich nicht geändert

„Es liegt an uns, im Sinne der UN-Konvention dafür zu kämpfen, dass sich das ändert.
Ich habe eine 53-jährige lernbehinderte Tochter, habe seit 50 Jahren mit dem Behindertenbereich zu tun und bin Vorsitzende des Vereins BEHINDERTENOMBUDSMANN, einer Art Selbsthilfegruppe von Menschen mit Behinderungen und deren Angehörigen.“ (Zitat Gerda Ressl)

Sissi Kammerlander 
Video bei 13m46s – Zitat aus der Analyse

Macht Kontaktabbruch zu den leiblichen Eltern Kinder krank?“ von Prinz/Gresser NZFam 21/2015http://www.NZFam.de : „Die Studien über die Folgen von Kontaktabbruch eines Kindes zu leiblichen Eltern kommen mit unterschiedlichen Ansätzen zu dem Ergebnis, dass ein Kontaktverlust zu den leiblichen Eltern mit erheblichen gesundheitlichen Schädigungen der Kinder einhergeht, die teilweise lebenslang anhalten.“

 

4. Cara St. Louis (USA): Abduction of the Child by the State Predator

Cara St.Louis is a writer, teacher, activist and speaker hailing from the American Southwest, infused with the old spirit of the sovereign individual. She has been and continues to be committed to Waldorf School’s teaching, which is a pedagogy centered around protecting the Imagination of the human being. She has been a journalist for such publications as Veterans Today and is the author of several books including Consolata’s Companion, about the dark side or archontic presence in our lives. The Sun Thief is a thinly fictionalized thriller about the murder of her mother who had a top Navy security clearance, and a pilot who steals a chemtrail plane. Dangerous Imagination, Silent Assimilation is the paradigm shifting book which flings the doors open to expose the vast coordinated manipulations to control and dominate humanity.

She is a former producer at The People’s Voice TV in London. Currently, she is at work on two projects: One is the follow-up to Dangerous Imagination. It is called The Workbook and is a series of stand-alone episodes, if you will. The first is out and is called False History, The Great Remembering. She has a project on the Celtic Hearth upcoming with master dowser and monolith theoretician, Maria Wheatley…also the daughter of novelist Dennis Wheatley. She has been a regular at International conferences this last few years, including one upcoming at the Bases Project in England. In late July, she embarks on a lecture tour Down Under.
http://vortexcourage.me/buy-the-book-…

From Dangerous Imagination, Silent Assimilation by Cara St. Louis and H. Kautz-Vella: „It was in 1923, as the Frankfurter Schule began its work (…) We are concerned here with a long-ranging, brilliantly conceived and really sinister operation (…) and without giving us any indications of its future plans – the school recommended the following, almost verbatim: (…) the creation of racist-crimes (…) sex education instruction for children (…) gigantic immigration waves, in order to destroy the identity (…) An unreliable legal system with prejudices vis-à-vis crime victims (…) a demand for the disintegration of the family“.

 

5. Mag. Josef Maitz (Österreich):

Die elterliche Verantwortung zurückgeben. Mag. Josef Maitz ist Jurist und selbst betroffener Vater, berät und begleitet Mütter, Väter und Großeltern, die fürchten, ihre Kinder zu verlieren, oder die ihre Kinder wieder zurückbekommen möchten, nachdem das Jugendamt sie geholt hat.
Aus rund sieben Jahren Beratungspraxis mit hunderten Fällen kann Mag. Maitz nicht nur die Lehren daraus verallgemeinern, sondern auch über Langzeitfolgen und Entwicklungen berichten.
Er übt seine Tätigkeit ehrenamtlich aus. Seine Praxiserfahrung betrifft alle österreichischen Bundesländer sowie transnationale und transkulturelle Elternbeziehungen.
Der Staat gibt Milliarden für die Konfliktsteigerung und Zerstörung der Familien aus, aber nichts, um den Familienzusammenhalt zu fördern.
Kindesentzug ist zu einem Industriekomplex geworden.
http://www.inev.at

 

6. Sissi Kammerlander Verein VICTIMS MISSION:
Zitat: „Kindesabnahme ist psychologische Kriegsführung gegen die Zivilbevölkerung“

E-Mail: info@victimsmission.com
Website: http://www.victimsmission.com

 

7.  Dr. Henning Witte (Schweden): Mindcontrol

Dr. Henning Witte ist Rechtsanwalt in Stockholm und Herausgeber von
http://www.whitetv.se
welches sich auf die Aufdeckung der Mind Control Technologie spezialisiert hat, die gefährlichste Geheimwaffe der Welt. White TV ist inzwischen der beliebteste alternative Informationskanal in Schweden.

Weitere Info: http://www.witte.se/indexde.htm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7u9xF…

 

Wien (pts020/19.05.2016/13:00) –
http://www.pressetext.com/news/201605…

Hello dear readers of Family and Family Law !

As a first, I would like to thank your interest in family law. It will be posted contributions from Austria, Germany, Italy and Switzerland. During special events and stories from other countries, such as England, America and even this rebloggt Allowed framing“.
At present (Feb. 2017), 157 people entered the automatically receive new posts by email. And 60 fixed Worpress users follow this blog. Secondly, I want to show you the new function of language change announce Top left is Home-Language-NewsYou have to select the Language-select country ‚button Here are various languages of the countries in Europe. Many products often involve two countries, therefore, is very important, for example, transparency, * with binational parents with children * Custody battle or child abduction Here is the direct link is to select your language for this page:

https://familiefamilienrecht.wordpress.com/language-country/

Select your Language !

thanks, if you like it please share this page: 1

https://familiefamilienrecht.wordpress.com/2015/07/15/hello-dear-reade…y-and-family-law/

 

Tags: Family court –  parental alienation – fatherless children